# Vendor rebates and special pricing > How supplier rebates, special pricing agreements and ship-and-debit claims work for distributors, and how to claim, reconcile and accrue them correctly. Source: https://docs.lumina-erp.com/distribution/vendor-rebates-and-special-pricing/ **In short.** Vendor rebates and special pricing claims are part of your cost. Under U.S. GAAP they reduce inventory cost and cost of goods sold as you earn them, so you accrue them monthly from each program's terms. A claim you never file or a rebate you only book when the check arrives makes margin wrong in both periods and leaves money with the supplier. For many distributors, the price on the supplier invoice is only a starting cost. Suppliers pay rebates for hitting volume or growth targets, and they fund lower costs on specific deals through special pricing agreements that the distributor claims back after the sale. Together these can be the difference between a product line that loses money and one that carries the business. ## At a glance | Program | What triggers it | When cash arrives | Tracked by | |---|---|---|---| | Volume rebate | Total purchases reach a tier over a period | After the period ends, often months later | Purchases against tier thresholds | | Growth rebate | Purchases grow over the prior period | After the period ends | Purchases against a baseline | | Special pricing agreement (SPA) | A sale to a named customer or project at an agreed lower cost | After each claim is approved | Each qualifying sale line | | Ship and debit | Same as an SPA, named for the mechanics | Credit memo per claim | Each qualifying sale line | | Cost-plus or contract claim | Selling to a contract customer at a price the supplier supports | After each claim | Each qualifying sale line | ## Supplier rebates ### Volume tiers A volume rebate pays a percentage of purchases once they cross a threshold during the program year. The key detail is whether the tier is **retroactive**. A retroactive tier pays the higher rate on every dollar once you reach it, while an incremental tier pays it only on dollars above the threshold. A retroactive tier makes the last few orders of the year worth far more than their face value, so buyers pull purchases forward in December. ### Growth tiers A growth rebate pays for beating a baseline, usually last year's purchases. It rewards share gains, but it resets every year, so a strong year raises next year's bar. Budget it conservatively. ### What counts Read each program for what purchases qualify (all items, or only certain product lines), what reduces the total (returns, stock rotation credits), whether purchases through a buying group count and when the claim or payment is due. Most disputes come from these definitions rather than the arithmetic. ## Special pricing agreements and ship and debit ### How they work A special pricing agreement is a supplier's commitment to support a lower cost on specific items sold to a specific customer or project, usually for a fixed period. It is common in electrical, industrial, HVAC and other distribution where manufacturers compete for large end users and projects. The distributor buys stock at its normal into-stock cost, sells to the named customer at the agreed price and then claims the difference between the into-stock cost and the SPA cost from the manufacturer. The claim is paid as a credit memo, hence the common name ship and debit. Industrial Supply Trends (David Gordon, August 26, 2024, retrieved 2026-09-28) describes SPAs as a post-sale credit adjustment to the into-stock price and names administration as the biggest burden for distributors. Every manufacturer runs its own process and rules, and missed or denied claims go straight to lost profit. ### The claim cycle 1. **Load the agreement.** Record the supplier, the customer or project, the items, the start and end dates, the SPA cost and the agreement number, so the ERP can recognize a qualifying sale. 2. **Price the sale.** The order line uses the customer's agreed sell price, and the line cost should show the SPA cost, not the into-stock cost, so the salesperson sees the real margin. 3. **Build the claim.** After invoicing, the claim lists each qualifying line: agreement number, invoice, date, customer, item, quantity, into-stock cost, SPA cost and the amount claimed. 4. **Submit.** Send it in the format and by the deadline the supplier requires. Many suppliers reject claims filed after a set number of days. 5. **Reconcile.** Match each credit memo to the claim lines it pays. Chase short pays and rejections with the supplier while the deadline allows. 6. **Close.** Write off what will not be paid, with a reason, and fix the cause so it does not recur. ### Cost-plus claims Some suppliers support contract pricing on a cost-plus basis. The distributor sells to a contract customer at a set markup over a supplier-defined cost and claims the gap between its actual cost and that cost. The mechanics match an SPA, but the claim amount depends on which cost the agreement names, so load it exactly as written. :::caution[Claim on the right cost] If your line cost changes after the sale (a new average cost or a cost correction), the claim should still use the into-stock cost the agreement recognizes. Most suppliers audit claims against their own records, and a claim built on the wrong cost is rejected or reclaimed later. ::: ## Accounting for rebates and claims ### What the guidance says Under U.S. GAAP, the FASB guidance on consideration received from a vendor is FASB ASC Subtopic 705-20, which grew out of EITF Issue 02-16 (linked below). In paraphrase, cash a reseller receives from a supplier is treated as a reduction of the price of the supplier's goods, so it reduces inventory cost and, as the goods sell, cost of goods sold. It is not revenue. The main exceptions are payments for distinct goods or services the reseller provides to the supplier. Another is reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs the reseller incurred to sell the supplier's products (for example, some co-op advertising), which reduce that cost instead. For rebates earned by reaching a purchase level, the EITF consensus has the customer recognize the rebate as it makes progress toward earning it, on a systematic and rational basis, as long as the amount is probable and reasonably estimable. It lists factors that make an estimate hard, such as a long program period, little history with the program, large past adjustments and products exposed to obsolescence or demand swings. When an estimate changes, the cumulative amount recognized is adjusted to the new estimate at once, with part of the change going to inventory if the related goods are still on hand. Treat this as practitioner guidance and confirm your policy with your accountant or auditor. ### Why the inventory split matters A rebate on goods still on the shelf has not been earned against a sale yet, so it reduces inventory. A rebate on goods already sold reduces cost of goods sold. Booking the whole rebate to cost of goods sold at once overstates margin in that period and understates it later when those goods sell at their full recorded cost. **Rebate accrual for the period:** `Qualifying purchases in the period × expected tier rate` **Share of accrual to cost of goods sold:** `Accrual × share of those purchases already sold` ## Worked example of a volume rebate accrual These numbers are invented and round. A supplier program pays, retroactive to the first dollar, 2% on annual purchases from $1,000,000 and 3% from $1,500,000. Below $1,000,000 it pays nothing. ### First quarter Purchases are $400,000. The buyer's forecast for the year is $1,600,000, and last year's purchases were similar, so the 3% tier is probable. - Accrual: $400,000 × 3% = **$12,000** - Of the first-quarter purchases, 75% have sold by quarter end: $12,000 × 75% = $9,000 to cost of goods sold, and $3,000 to inventory ```text First-quarter rebate accrual Debit Vendor rebate receivable 12,000.00 Credit Cost of goods sold 9,000.00 Credit Inventory 3,000.00 ``` _Interactive calculator available on the web page._ ### Third-quarter change in estimate By the end of the third quarter, cumulative purchases are $1,000,000 and $30,000 has been accrued at 3%. A large project slips to next year, and the forecast for the year falls to $1,300,000, which only reaches the 2% tier. - Revised cumulative estimate: $1,000,000 × 2% = $20,000 - Catch-up adjustment: $30,000 minus $20,000 = **$10,000** less rebate - If 90% of cumulative purchases have sold, $9,000 of the adjustment increases cost of goods sold and $1,000 increases inventory The third quarter's margin takes the whole $9,000 correction, the cost of accruing at a tier that turned out to be optimistic. The tier estimate therefore needs a documented forecast behind it every quarter. ### Year end Purchases finish at $1,300,000. The rebate earned is $1,300,000 × 2% = **$26,000**, which the receivable should equal after the fourth-quarter accrual. The supplier pays it in the following spring, and the payment clears the receivable with no effect on margin. ## How untracked rebates and claims distort margin ### Rebates booked on cash If the $26,000 above is booked only when the check arrives, the program year shows too little margin and the month the check lands shows a spike that has nothing to do with that month's sales. Every margin trend across those periods is wrong, and anyone judging the supplier line or the buyers on it is working from bad numbers. With invented numbers, say a supplier line has $2,000,000 of sales at an 18.0% invoice margin, so invoice cost is $1,640,000. A 3% rebate on $1,640,000 of purchases is $49,200. With the rebate netted into cost, the line's margin is ($2,000,000 minus $1,640,000 plus $49,200) ÷ $2,000,000 = **20.5%**. A line reviewed at 18.0% may be dropped or repriced when it is one of the better lines you carry. ### SPA claims never filed An SPA sale looks unprofitable at into-stock cost until the claim is paid. Take an invented SPA with an into-stock cost of $80.00, an SPA cost of $62.00, a sell price of $70.00 and 100 units. | View | Cost per unit | Margin per unit | Margin % | Margin on 100 units | |---|---|---|---|---| | Into-stock cost, claim not filed | $80.00 | minus $10.00 | minus 14.3% | minus $1,000 | | SPA cost, claim paid | $62.00 | $8.00 | 11.4% | $800 | The unfiled claim is worth $1,800. If the order line carries the into-stock cost, sales reports show a loss and salespeople learn to avoid SPA business. If it carries the SPA cost but no claim is filed, reports show a profit that never arrives. Either way, the fix is to match every SPA sale to a claim, and every claim to a credit. For how rebates fit into the full picture of what an account earns, see [invoice margin versus pocket margin](/distribution/pricing-and-margin/). ## KPIs worth tracking Four measures show how well you collect on these programs. | KPI | Formula | What it tells you | |---|---|---| | Rebate receivable aging | Unpaid rebate and claim balance by age | Old balances are disputed or forgotten | | Claim recovery rate | Credits received ÷ amounts claimed | Share of claims actually paid | | Claim lag | Average days from invoice to claim submission | How close you run to supplier deadlines | | Unclaimed qualifying lines | SPA-eligible lines with no claim | Money left with the supplier | ## Running your rebate programs 1. List every supplier program: type, tiers, retroactive or incremental, qualifying purchases and deadlines. Give each an owner. 2. Load SPAs into the ERP with dates and costs, so qualifying sales carry the SPA cost and flag themselves for a claim. 3. File claims on a fixed schedule well inside supplier deadlines, and reconcile every credit to its claim lines. 4. Accrue rebates monthly at the probable tier, split between inventory and cost of goods sold, and document the forecast behind the tier. 5. Report margin by supplier line with rebates and claims netted in, and review the rebate receivable aging every month. The accrual belongs in the close. See the vendor rebate steps in the [month-end close checklist](/erp-projects/month-end-close-for-distributors/). ## Sources - [EITF Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor (FASB)](https://storage.fasb.org/abs02-16.pdf) - [SPAs, or Ship & Debit, can be Sales and Profit Drivers or Drags (Industrial Supply Trends, David Gordon, August 26, 2024)](https://industrialsupplytrends.com/spas-or-ship-debit-can-be-sales-and-profit-drivers-or-drags/) --- Epicor, Prophet 21, P21 and DynaChange are trademarks or registered trademarks of Epicor Software Corporation registered in the United States and other countries. Kinetic is a trademark of Epicor Software Corporation. Lumina ERP is an independent consultancy and is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Epicor.